Showing posts with label foreclosed properties in the Philippines. Show all posts
Showing posts with label foreclosed properties in the Philippines. Show all posts

Thursday, February 5, 2009

Permanent Moratorium on home foreclosure

is planning to ask the Balikatan Housing Finance Inc. () for a permanent moratorium on home foreclosure after the holiday is over. This month, his request for moratorium will expire and might start with its foreclosure proceedings for delinquent homeowners. The Mayor, however, admitted that he is helpless with the situation and that only President Arroyo and Congress can solve the foreclosure problem in his locality. He can only requests for extension or maybe, a permanent moratorium, but, he cannot really force them if the mortgage company will do otherwise. The is currently foreclosing more than 6,000 homes of delinquent owners. House Speaker Prospero Nograles said that indeed, the problem with Balikatan is a national issue that could only be settled by the national government. The complexity involves a transaction where a local financial entity has sold non-performing assets of great magnitude to a foreign investor. The House is now investigating and Speaker Nograles has promised to find the solution. In the meantime, he has warned the Balikatan not to keep on with its foreclosures especially in this city.

Source: Pinoy Herald

Saturday, January 31, 2009

Homeowners ally with leftist groups

Thursday, January 08, 2009

ATTEMPTING to strengthen its force against foreclosure of its home mortgages by Balikatan Housing Finance Inc. (BHFI), the Davao City Federation of Homeowners Associations (DCFHA) has allied with Bayan Muna and Kadamay, an urban poor organization associated with the militants.

Councilor Danilo Dayanghirang, DCFHA founding chairman said, they met with Bayan Muna leader Joel Virador Monday and the latter agreed to help.

Arroyo Watch: Sun.Star blog on President Arroyo

"We are separating the advocacy from the legal issues. Bayan Muna will focus more on the advocacy of stopping the foreclosures and having a resolution to the whole problem. The legal area naman will be handled by us and the lawyer provided by the city," Dayanghirang said.

He added that Mayor Rodrigo Duterte has already granted him permission to fly to Manila Thursday to personally follow up their appeal to President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo which was coursed through Secretary Silvestre Bello III.

"I will also be gathering documents as we are also pushing for the review of the concept of how Balikatan operates as well as its creation," Dayanghirang said.

Dayanghirang added they do not fear to be branded as left-wingers due to the alliance.

"It is a question of a specific issue, not political stand. Anybody who can and is willing to help, dawaton na namo. Asa man diay mi magayo ug tabang (we will welcome. Where else will we ask help from)? Of course not from the rich people there in Congress. We seek help from those who understand the plight of the poor who are now standing to lose their homes," Dayanghirang said.

Officers of DCFHA present during the interview said about 70 homeowners in Luzville Subdivision in Panacan have already been driven out of their homes.

Buyers of the foreclosed properties reportedly showed up with the sheriff and asked the present occupant to leave.

The BHFI is foreclosing 6,000 homes of delinquent homeowners in the city.

Research on the controversial Balikatan showed it was created sometime in 2004 along with Bahay Financing Services Inc. (BFSI) to help resolve the backlog in mortgage payments in the housing sector.

BFSI was created for servicing, management, and administration of mortgage loans and related collateral property in the Philippines held by BHFI, a holding company set up and owned by DB Real Estate Global Opportunities IB, LP (DBGO) and National Home Mortgage Finance Corporation (NHMFC).

BHFI even received a P1.6-billion loan from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) in May 2005 to help NHMFC collect highly delinquent mortgage loans.

An ADB press release dated May 31, 2005 stated that the non-performing liabilities (NPL) portfolio sold by NHMFC has a total outstanding principal balance of P13.45 billion.

These are from 53,000 individual low- and middle-class housing loans in 500 housing subdivisions all over the country.

"In May 2004, following a competitive auction, DBGO signed a loan sale purchase agreement with NHMFC. DBGO, a $360 million fund that invests globally in real estate and real estate-related assets, is managed by DB Real Estate, the real estate asset management arm of Deutsche Bank AG. Managing more than $56 billion, DB Real Estate is the world's largest real estate fund manager based on assets under management," the press release stated.

In the 2007 Annual Report of the ADB, it recalled how and why BFSI and BHFI were created.

The report said what prompted the creation was NHMFC's difficulty in collecting mortgage payments from those who took out low- and middle-income housing units starting in the late 1980s.

"As the houses were built, NHMFC purchased the mortgage-secured loans extended to home buyers by accredited financial institutions and housing developers using funds borrowed from the Social Security System, Government Service Insurance System, and Home Development Mutual Fund (Pag-IBIG), the funders," the report said.

But low repayment rates snowballed, thus by 1996, uncollected loan accounts made the funders give more support.

The highly delinquent loans were auctioned off in May 2004 and the DB Real Estate Global Opportunities IB, L.P. (DBGO) won the bid.

"ADB provided debt financing of up to $33 million to Balikatan Housing Finance Inc., the special-purpose vehicle jointly owned by DBGO and NHMFC and which acquired the nonperforming loans from NHMFC. ADB also invested in a 10 percent equity stake in Bahay Financial Services Inc., a loan-servicing company established by DBGO to restructure and service the loans in behalf of Balikatan Housing Finance. A Philippine-peso bond issue -- a first for ADB -- provided the necessary funding," the report said.

"This transaction marked the first time that a local financial entity had sold nonperforming assets (NPAs) of such magnitude to a foreign investor, and showed domestic and international investors that the country was determined to solve its NPA problem," the report continued.

The portion about the NHMFC auction of the NPAs was highlighted in the non-sovereign operations portion of the report as an example of how ADB assisted in "dealing with non-performing loans to bolster housing in the Philippines."

Source: Sunstar

Friday, January 30, 2009

Bill seeks to bar TROs over foreclosed properties

MANILA, Philippines - A bill pending in the House of Representatives seeks to bar unscrupulous parties from abusing court procedures to delay the auctioning of foreclosed properties.

House Bill 5530 seeks to prohibit courts from issuing restraining orders or preliminary injunction in cases involving public auction sales arising from such foreclosure.

"During this time of global financial recession, there is an imperative need to protect the interest not only of banks but other financial institutions in the country in order to ensure the long-term financial stability of our economy," House committee on banks and financial intermediaries vice chairman Rep. Al Francis Bichara (Albay) said in an article on the House of Representatives website.

The bill also calls for the protection of banks and financial institutions against scheming and unscrupulous debtors to ensure the national economy's long-term financial stability.

Bichara sought the immediate passage of the bill amid the global crisis.

In the Philippines, Bichara said loans, most especially those involving large amounts of money, are usually secured by real estate mortgages.

"Unfortunately, the power of banks to collect and foreclose said real estate mortgages upon default of the debtors are usually hampered by the injunctive power of the courts which are sometimes used by cunning debtors unjustifiably," he said.

Bichara said public auction sales arising from extra-judicial foreclosure of real estate mortgages generally enjoy the presumption of regularity.

"More importantly, even the Supreme Court has already adopted measures to temper the injunctive powers of courts in relation to extra-judicial foreclosure proceedings, in order to fully protect the interest of innocent lenders and, or creditors," he said.

The bill seeks to prohibit courts from issuing restraining orders or preliminary injunction in cases involving public auction sales arising from the foreclosure of real estate mortgages in the Philippines.

It provides that no court shall have the jurisdiction to issue any restraining order, preliminary injunction, or preliminary mandatory injunction in any case, dispute or controversy involving public auction sales arising from foreclosure of real estate mortgages, including the prohibition of any person or persons, entity or governmental official from proceeding with, or continuing the execution or implementation of public auction sales arising from extra-judicial foreclosure of real estate mortgages provided that certain basic essential requisites are duly complied with.

These requisites include that the Notice of Sale has been posted for not less than 20 days in at least three public places of the municipality or city where the property is situated.

If such property is worth more than P50,000, such notice should be published once a week for at least three consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the municipality or city.

Also, it provides that despite the absence of these basic requisites, no restraining order, preliminary injunction or preliminary mandatory injunction shall be issued when the mortgagee has clearly established that the loan secured by the real estate mortgage is due and demandable and that the mortgagor is delinquent in his payment and or has failed to make payments.

It also provides that no restraining order, preliminary injunction, or preliminary mandatory injunction shall be issued based solely on the following mere allegations of the mortgagee: That the loan secured by the real estate mortgage has been paid, or is not delinquent; and, That the interest in the loan secured by the real estate mortgage is unconscionable. - GMANews.TV

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Buying foreclosed homes? Choose carefully.


By JUDITH BALEA, abs-cbnNEWS.com | 12/05/2008 8:13 PM

Whether it's investors looking to buy cheap and sell for profit, or families who want to bring their renting days to an end, foreclosed homes have a sure market.

In the last couple of years, foreclosed properties being sold by banks have been gaining popularity on the idea that they fit more easily into the budget than brand new homes.

Banks regularly hold auctions to bid out these second- or, sometimes, third-hand homes to prospective buyers. But they also book effortless sales just from taking dozens of calls a day from clients.

The secret is to give people incentives to entice them to take a risk on a foreclosed house, Janette Abad Santos, assistant vice president of Philippine National Bank's (PNB) Asset Management Group, told abs-cbnNEWS.com in an interview.

Foreclosed homes could sell for a fraction of their worth in the market, and may seem like a steal. However, if one's not careful in choosing, these kinds of homes could also harbor unpleasant surprises and could run into a lot of money for those who don't have much of it to start with.

Banks' bad assets

Simply put, foreclosure happens when a buyer fails to make timely repayments for a bank loan it used to pay for a property. The lender, after filing a notice of default, will then initiate the legal process to reclaim ownership of the particular asset.

This is perhaps the last thing in the mind of home buyers. Yet, many times, they are confronted with the problem due to unexpected circumstances like when they lose their jobs or incur huge medical expenses.

Meanwhile, in as much as banks want to repossess a property from a delinquent borrower, they don't really like keeping it.

Once banks take a property back, this falls in the list of their real and other properties acquired (ROPOA), which they sell at market value or below, depending on the condition of the properties.

Banks are in the business of lending and investing money, so naturally, they want cold cash. To them, foreclosed properties are bad assets that if they don't dispose of, would pile up and get too costly.

Bad assets punish banks in three ways. Banks do not only get stuck with an asset they could not collect and earn from, they also have to spend resources--from lawyers to security guards in the property--to justify why the asset should beawarded to them.

And, as a lesson from the 1997 financial crisis when aggressive bank lending fueled a real estate boom, Philippine banks are also mandated to set aside buffer funds--usually resulting in the need for the owners to cough up more funds to increase their capital base. The buffer funds are required to cover the banks' risk of eventually not collecting what they lent out, most of which are actually their depositors' and investors' money.

Lastly, having too many bad assets in their books doesn't speak well of the banks' claim of business prudence. Bad assets show off their poor lending decisions.

At end-September, Philippine commercial and universal banks' ROPA stood at P142.39 billion, down by 1.97 percent from P145.25 billion in the previous month, data from the central bank showed.

Big discounts

The buildup in banks' bad assets can't be helped, especially when the time between foreclosing a property and selling it takes too long, said Abad Santos.

"Before a property is foreclosed, the owner is given a year or so to remedy the soured loan. If he fails to, then the foreclosure proceeding begins. Even when the property is already transferred to the bank, we cannot sell it until a year after to give the former owner a chance to redeem his property," she explained.

As banks get loaded with foreclosed assets, they become more willing to negotiate with interested buyers who often pull an offer off the table and haggle. Such is the case with PNB.

In the industry, according to Abad Santos, PNB holds the largest inventory of foreclosed properties, with roughly 15,000 real estate products, of which 11,000 are residential houses, lots or the combination of both priced at P1 million and less. The bank's properties in all are worth a hefty P30 billion in market value.

But it does not expect to recover the full amount anymore.

"The bank normally sells a property at market value. However, like a tiangge (flea market), if you want to sell fast you should be willing to bring down your prices," she noted.

Abad Santos said PNB offers discounts of between 10 to 30 percent on homes. Aside from this, the bank also provides in-house financing carrying a fixed interest of as low as 8 percent over a period of one to 10 years, for properties worth P1 million and below; and up to 12 percent over five to 10 years for those that are above P1 million. Industry rates are basically in the same range.

Behind the discount

These discounts have a story that wise homebuyers need to know to fully understand why foreclosed properties are priced as such.

Banks are wise. In this centuries-old business of lending, they are fully aware that it is inevitable to encounter borrowers who couldn't pay up, whether due to bad business bets or because of issues that are beyond their control, such as the tumbling of the entire local economy.

Thus, right at the start when borrowers apply for a loan, banks already asses the collateral offered--usually a real estate property--based on the most conservative of standards. The most prudent banks in the Philippines usually value the collateral property being offered a few notches below their current market price.

For example, a Fort Bonifacio condominium owner might have bought the unit at about P5 million, but the conservative banks would asses it at P4.8 million or lower, depending on the banks' perception of price risks, which could be influenced by oversupply or inflation in construction materials.

It is from this assessed value that the banks would now base how much they will lend to the borrower.

Currently, banks lend only the equivalent 60 percent of the assessed value of the property. In the Fort Bonifacio unit example, that means the bank will only lend P2.88 million to the borrower.

Banks say the property owner should shoulder the remaining 40 percent of the property's value (equivalent to P1.92 million in the Fort Bonifacio example) as a proof of the borrowers earnestness. By shouldering a portion of the property's value, the banks don't end up financing the entire deal.

But that's just one way to put it.

The other way is this: Banks know that when bad assets pile up, they will have to spend that 40 percent (that P1.92 million) in legal fees during numerous court proceedings, and litigation and documentary requirements, and in some instances, even hiring security guards to make sure illegal settlers don't inhabit the property, thus further reducing its resale value.

Obviously, banks would like to recover 100 percent of what they lent out, and hopefully the legal and other costs they incurred in trying to recover the property and cashing it in.

To the second—or third—hand homebuyers, discounts in foreclosed assets that go up to 40 percent mean the banks are already willing to absorb their legal and other costs.

In the Fort Bonifacio example, it means the bank is willing to swallow the P1.92 million (the 40 percent portion) as a foregone resource just so it could recover the P2.88 million (the 60 percent portion) that it lent out.

In other words, the discounts depend on how desperate the individual banks are to convert these foreclosed properties into cash. The more foreclosed properties they have, the more the probability that they are selling these foreclosed assets at firesale prices.

Buyer beware

Buyers also need to beware of deep discounts. More often than not, there is a catch.

Usually, foreclosed properties at rock-bottom prices have "defects"-- from an impending legal case to the perennial problem of squatters. Sometimes, it could be that the title of the property has not been transferred under the bank's name yet, the reason why an irked former owner won't leave the place.

"These are some of the encumbrances that a buyer will have to take on when purchasing cheap properties. They have to keep in mind that all banks sell properties on an 'as-is, where is' basis," said Abad Santos.

A buyer is therefore advised to thoroughly inspect a foreclosed home before purchasing it. Or else, he could be snatching up a deal that's not as good as he first thought.

Diverse market

Abad Santos described the market for foreclosed homes as "vast."

"We have buyers coming from the A, B and C segments. These include big businesses, individual investors, overseas Filipinos and start-up families," she said.

And behind every home purchase she witnessed was an interesting sub story.

There were those who have turned buying and selling properties into a business while some just wanted an affordable place they can call their own.

Abad Santos recalled that they had foreign clients who got homes for retirement purposes or simply to have a proof of investment in the Philippines.

Overseas Filipinos, in particular, would usually buy homes for their families in their hometowns.

Many times, however, a former owner of a foreclosed home and his family would share expenses to win the property back because of its sentimental value.

"Largely, purchases here are emotional. But you see, that's how we Filipinos value our families and the things we share with them like our homes," she added.

as of 12/05/2008 8:13 PM

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

SSS' FORECLOSED PROPERTIES OFFERED AT 5% DEPOSIT

PHILIPPINES LATEST NEWS
2008-10-31 14:02:34 - MANILA. Easier purchasing rules are unveiled at the Housing Fair. SSS relaxes foreclosed housing sale conditions

By Catherine J Teves


The Social Security System (SSS) is offering, through its year-long Housing Fair III program beginning October 2008, more lenient terms for prospective buyers of the agency's acquired residential properties.

MORE PHILIPPINES NEWS: www.balitapinoy.net

SSS lowered its required downpayment from 10 percent to five percent of a property's selling price which is based, in turn, on its fair market value.

"This

is among the changes we made so that more people can avail of properties the SSS is disposing," the agency's Real Estate Department Section Head Tomas Ramirez said Thursday at the on-going third Housing Fair in Mandaluyong City.

He also said SSS raised from PhP300,000 to PhP500,000 maximum selling price to be levied six percent interest.

Properties selling above PhP500,000, not PhP300,000 as previously required, will be charged nine percent interest.

Ramirez further said SSS adjusted applicants' maximum age limit from 65 to 70 years.

"Sixty-five year-olds can still apply for a five-year housing term," he noted.

He assured properties for sale are covered by fire insurance.

SSS' October 2008 inventory shows 427 single detached houses and other residential properties nationwide, collectively valued at PhP185.97 million, are up for disposal.

Prospective buyers can contact SSS Real Estate Department at (02) 920-64-01 locals 5121 to 5127 to inquire about these properties' location and other details.

To further encourage prospective buyers, Ramirez said SSS increased from five to 10 percent its discount on cash sales made during Housing Fair III.

SSS is also giving buyers an additional 10 percent discount if they're able to evict occupants illegally occupying properties they bought.

This program is SSS' support to the Housing Fair government-run Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council spearheaded yearly since 2006.

SSS' Housing Fair program aims to help more Filipinos acquire their own houses so nationwide housing backlog can be reduced.

This program also seeks to help dispose SSS-acquired residential properties.

"Through Housing Fairs I and II, SSS was able to sell 454 residential properties worth some PhP198.6 million," Ramirez noted.

He said Filipinos working in both public and private sectors as well as overseas Filipino workers can buy properties under Housing Fair III.

Non-SSS members can also apply for Housing Fair III residential properties, he added.

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Explain foreclosures, gov’t agency told

By Judy Quiros, Allan Nawal
Mindanao Bureau
First Posted 04:01:00 10/22/2008

DAVAO CITY, Philippines—The Ombudsman has given the government’s National Home Mortgage Finance Corp. (NHMFC) in Mindanao 15 days to explain why it foreclosed on a number of low-cost and socialized real estate mortgages and resold these to the Balikatan Housing Finance Corp. (BHFC), a private corporation.

Davao City Councilor Danilo Dayanghirang filed the complaint against the NHMFC and BHFC on Sept. 13, saying it was one of the “biggest scandals” under Vice President Noli de Castro’s administration as chair of the Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council (HUDCC).

According to Dayanghirang, the NHMFC foreclosed on 9,000 homes in this city alone and transferred ownership to the BHFC, a subsidiary of Deutsche Bank Real Estate Global Opportunities based in Germany.

He did not say when the foreclosures started.

“I took up the cudgels for the city’s homeowners; this is a nationwide problem,” Dayanghirang said.

Last alternative

Lawyer Dante Rizada of the NHMFC’s legal department said the fund agency foreclosed on “thousands” of properties nationwide because they were considered “highly delinquent” accounts.

“Foreclosing properties is our last alternative. We want to understand [homeowners] but we also need to take the necessary steps to protect the agency,” Rizada said.

He said the NHMFC had given homeowners a chance to pay their amortization but financial difficulties prevented them from keeping up with the payments.

Rizada said that before foreclosing on any property, they send out demand letters and notices.

“But some homeowners abandon their property before the actual foreclosure,” he said.

Rizada declined to speak on the agreement between the NHMFC and BHFC.

Though Dayanghirang said the deal was irregular because it did not pass Congress. He also said the NHMFC was transacting business with a company it partially owned.

Dayanghirang claimed the NHMFC owned 41 percent of BHFC, while DB Global Real Estate Opportunities owned 51 percent.

Higher rates

While homeowners could still buy back foreclosed properties by dealing with the BHFC, Dayanghirang said they would have to pay higher interest rates.

The NHMFC only charges nine percent interest while the BHFC charges 14 percent interest.

He also said the BHFC did not offer loan condonation unlike the NHMFC.

Dayanghirang said he had asked Congress for help before he filed a complaint with the Ombudsman but nothing happened.

“Congress, specifically Speaker Prospero Nograles, said he would call for an immediate investigation of Balikatan but until now nothing has been done,” he said.

Source: Inq.NET


Monday, October 27, 2008

Think Rich Pinoy Event

Have Fun Learning Wealth Creation! Join Larry & The TRP Team

What : Think Rich Pinoy Workshop
When : November 22 ,2008, Saturday
Where: PhilamLife Building, Manila
Text : 0915-499-1999
Early Bird Fee: P 1475 / US 37 (Buy on or before October 3,2008
Normal Admission Fee: P 1975.00 / US 47
Email: richteamevents+blog@gmail.com

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Explain foreclosures, gov’t agency told

By Judy Quiros, Allan Nawal
Mindanao Bureau
First Posted 04:01:00 10/22/2008

DAVAO CITY, Philippines—The Ombudsman has given the government’s National Home Mortgage Finance Corp. (NHMFC) in Mindanao 15 days to explain why it foreclosed on a number of low-cost and socialized real estate mortgages and resold these to the Balikatan Housing Finance Corp. (BHFC), a private corporation.

Davao City Councilor Danilo Dayanghirang filed the complaint against the NHMFC and BHFC on Sept. 13, saying it was one of the “biggest scandals” under Vice President Noli de Castro’s administration as chair of the Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council (HUDCC).

According to Dayanghirang, the NHMFC foreclosed on 9,000 homes in this city alone and transferred ownership to the BHFC, a subsidiary of Deutsche Bank Real Estate Global Opportunities based in Germany.

He did not say when the foreclosures started.

“I took up the cudgels for the city’s homeowners; this is a nationwide problem,” Dayanghirang said.

Last alternative

Lawyer Dante Rizada of the NHMFC’s legal department said the fund agency foreclosed on “thousands” of properties nationwide because they were considered “highly delinquent” accounts.

“Foreclosing properties is our last alternative. We want to understand [homeowners] but we also need to take the necessary steps to protect the agency,” Rizada said.

He said the NHMFC had given homeowners a chance to pay their amortization but financial difficulties prevented them from keeping up with the payments.

Rizada said that before foreclosing on any property, they send out demand letters and notices.

“But some homeowners abandon their property before the actual foreclosure,” he said.

Rizada declined to speak on the agreement between the NHMFC and BHFC.

Though Dayanghirang said the deal was irregular because it did not pass Congress. He also said the NHMFC was transacting business with a company it partially owned.

Dayanghirang claimed the NHMFC owned 41 percent of BHFC, while DB Global Real Estate Opportunities owned 51 percent.

Higher rates

While homeowners could still buy back foreclosed properties by dealing with the BHFC, Dayanghirang said they would have to pay higher interest rates.

The NHMFC only charges nine percent interest while the BHFC charges 14 percent interest.

He also said the BHFC did not offer loan condonation unlike the NHMFC.

Dayanghirang said he had asked Congress for help before he filed a complaint with the Ombudsman but nothing happened.

“Congress, specifically Speaker Prospero Nograles, said he would call for an immediate investigation of Balikatan but until now nothing has been done,” he said.

Source: Inq.net


Friday, October 17, 2008

Arroyo to sign anti-foreclosure bill Monday

All Filipinos who are in the Philippine foreclosure industry ought to be aware of this new law:
MANILA, Philippines - President Arroyo will sign into law this coming Monday a bill providing for an anti-foreclosure program to benefit some 368,535 delinquent home borrowers who have debts worth about P66.69 billion.

House Speaker Prospero Nograles Jr. said that without the measure, the delinquent home borrowers would have rejoined the ranks of the homeless.
"This is part of the Arroyo government's numerous reform measures to shield our people from the current economic crisis. This measure will undoubtedly save many of our countrymen who face the grim prospect of losing their respective houses from joining the long list of the homeless," Nograles said in an article posted on the House of Representatives website.
He said the anti-foreclosure law is a reversal of the United States' bailout scheme that provided credit facilities to investment houses and banks that went bankrupt.
In the US, he said, they are bailing out those who facilitated the housing loans but are not saving the borrowers whose homes were foreclosed because of the subprime mortage crisis.
But in the Philippines, he said, "we are not bailing out those who provided the housing loans but we are saving the borrowers themselves."
Nograles, who has been pushing for the approval of the anti-foreclosure measure since 2001, commended the joint efforts of the House Committee on Housing and Urban Development chaired by Rep. Rodolfo Valencia and the Senate Committee on Urban Planning, Housing and Resettlement headed by Senator Juan Miguel Zubiri.
He added the program supports President Arroyo's social reform programs to mitigate the plight of the people against the ill effects of the economic crisis.
Valencia said the bicameral conference committee worked overtime to reconcile all minor differences between the two versions of the proposed "Socialized and Low Cost Housing Loan Restructuring Act of 2008" contained in House Bill 4220 and Senate Bill 1987.
The program will cover all socialized and low-cost housing loan accounts with any of the government financing institutions and agencies that have at least three (3) months of unpaid monthly amortizations, the original principal amount of which, does not exceed
P2.5 million.

The restructuring measure provides for the creation of a Congressional Oversight Committee composed of the Chairman of the Senate Committee on Urban Planning, Housing and Resettlement and the Chairman of the House Committee on Housing and Urban Development, four members each from the Senate and the House of Representatives.
Upon review and approval of the implementing rules and regulations, the oversight committee shall cease to exist, provided that an annual report on the loan restructuring and condonation program are regularly submitted to Congress by the GFIs and housing agencies.
Other authors of the measure include Deputy Speakers Amelita Villarosa and Raul del Mar, Reps. Mary Ann Susano, Rolando Uy, Thelma Almario, Eufrocino Codilla, Sr., Reylina Nicolas, Marcy Teodoro, and Edgardo Chatto.
"It will also be beneficial to the housing agencies and government financing institutions as not only will they be able to continue their collection of amortization, but will give them relief from the difficulty of evicting delinquent occupants and from the tedious and costly foreclosure procedures that average from P50,000 to P136,000," Zialcita noted.
According to Valencia, the law covers defaulting accounts even if the delinquent home borrowers have already availed of the benefits of previous restructuring programs.

"An application for restructuring shall not be charged a processing fee and no down payment shall be required for a borrower to apply for the benefits of this loan restructuring and condonation program," Valencia said.
Likewise, all penalties and surcharges shall be condoned upon approval of the restructuring application. As such, reasonable portion of the accrued interests will be condoned while the remaining accrued interests will be treated as non-interest bearing principals to be equally spread during the term of the restructured loan.
The restructured original principal loan will only be imposed an interest not higher than on the original loan or not more than 12%, whichever is lower.
The term of the housing loan may be extended for a period longer than its original term in order to lower the amount, provided that the extension of the restructured loan must not exceed the borrower's age at the time of application and the age 70.
However, Valencia added, the failure on the part of the borrower to pay any amortization during the three-year period shall be a cause for the housing agencies and government financing institutions to institute foreclosure proceedings against the property covered by the defaulting account.
In case of incapacity of a borrower, his legal heirs and successors-in-interest may assume payment of his outstanding loan provided that they pass the housing agencies' or government financing institutions' eligibility requirements.

Source of News: GMANews.TV